This Old House

Review of This Old House Appxis

When I first opened This Old House, I approached it less like a toolbox and more like a guided source of home-improvement ideas. That distinction matters. The app comes from This Old House, a familiar name in home renovation, but it is not a replacement for a contractor, a measuring tool, or a complete project-management system. Its strongest role is helping you move from “I should do something about this room” to a clearer idea of what to research and what kind of project might suit your home.

For a first-time user, the experience is fairly approachable. You can browse the material at your own pace, save ideas mentally or use the app as a companion while planning, and decide whether the subject is relevant before spending money on supplies. I found that most of the value appears when I use it before visiting a hardware store, not while I am already halfway through a repair. It helps shape the question first: am I looking for inspiration, instructions, maintenance guidance, or a realistic sense of the work involved?

What to expect before you begin

This is a free House & Home app for Android, developed by This Old House. It is aimed at everyday homeowners and curious renters rather than only experienced do-it-yourself workers. The age rating is Everyone, which fits the general tone and subject matter. The app has reached over ten thousand installs, with an average rating of 3.8 from a little over two hundred ratings, so I would describe its reception as positive but not universally smooth.

The first thing to understand is that the app’s identity is editorial. It presents the world of home improvement through the This Old House brand, so the useful question is not “Will this app complete my renovation?” but “Will this help me choose and understand my next renovation task?” That makes it particularly helpful during the uncertain stage when you are comparing possibilities such as repainting, improving storage, refreshing an outdoor area, or learning how a household system should be maintained.

I would not install it expecting a precise quote for your home. Homes differ too much in age, construction, local rules, materials, and existing damage for a general app to make the final call. I also would not rely on it alone for electrical, structural, gas, roofing, or other high-risk work. In those cases, the app can support your research, but professional inspection and local expertise should remain the deciding factors.

The current version is 2.0.500017 - P.d5a1cea3d, and it runs on Android 6.0 or later. That broad system requirement makes it accessible on older Android devices, although the experience can still depend on your phone’s screen size, storage, and general performance. The app itself is free to install, while in-app purchases are listed from $9.99 to $95.99 per item. I would check the purchase screen carefully before confirming anything, especially if you are only exploring the app and have not yet decided how deeply you want to use it.

Who will get the most from it

I think it suits three kinds of people especially well. The first is a new homeowner who has a long list of improvements but no sensible order for tackling them. The second is someone who enjoys learning the reasoning behind a project before buying tools. The third is a renter or apartment resident looking for ideas that can be adapted without immediately committing to major construction.

It is less suitable for someone who wants a tightly organized checklist with material quantities, automatic budgeting, contractor scheduling, or room-by-room measurements. A dedicated renovation planner, a notes app, or a spreadsheet may be better for those jobs. Likewise, if you already know exactly how to complete a specialized repair, the app may feel slower than a focused manual or manufacturer guide.

Getting from installation to a useful first result

Start with a question, not a room makeover

My advice is to install it with one modest question in mind. “How do I improve my entire kitchen?” is too broad for a first session. “What should I consider before changing this backsplash?” or “What can make this entryway easier to use?” gives you a practical filter. A narrow question helps you notice whether the app is actually useful for your situation rather than simply collecting attractive ideas.

During the first browse, resist the temptation to treat every appealing project as a recommendation. Home-improvement content often makes a finished room look simple because the messy middle has been edited away. I use the app to identify the decisions hidden behind the result: preparation, compatibility, access, cleanup, timing, and whether the improvement solves a real problem in my home.

A useful first-session habit is to keep a separate note with three headings: “I can do this,” “I need to investigate,” and “I should hire help.” As you explore, place ideas into one of those groups. This turns passive browsing into a decision process and prevents the common mistake of buying materials before checking whether the project is appropriate for your skill level or property.

Make the first successful action deliberately small

The best first success is not a dramatic transformation. It is leaving the app with one clearly defined next action. For example, after researching an irritating draft near a door, your next action might be to inspect the frame in daylight, photograph the problem, and identify whether the gap comes from worn weatherstripping, a loose hinge, or a larger alignment issue. That is more useful than vaguely deciding to “fix the door.”

I also recommend using the app before shopping. Write down the problem, the surface involved, and the result you want. Then browse with those details visible. This reduces impulse purchases and makes it easier to notice when an appealing solution depends on conditions your home does not have. A product or technique that works beautifully on one surface may be unsuitable for another, so the app should begin your investigation rather than end it.

For a simple weekend task, I would follow this sequence: inspect the area, read or watch enough to understand the approach, list the tools already available, identify the step most likely to cause trouble, and only then decide whether to proceed. That workflow is one of the app’s practical strengths. It encourages preparation, even though the app is not itself a full project manager.

A realistic everyday scenario

Imagine that I notice peeling paint around a bathroom window. My first impulse might be to buy a new color and cover it immediately. Instead, I would use the app to learn what questions deserve attention before painting: Is moisture entering from outside? Is the surface sound? Does the room need better ventilation? Is the old coating compatible with the new one? If the damage points to a leak or persistent dampness, cosmetic work is not the first step.

After that research, my meaningful result could be a short inspection plan rather than a finished wall. I would check the trim, look for signs of recurring moisture, photograph the affected area, and decide whether this is a manageable preparation-and-paint job or a reason to call someone experienced. That may sound less exciting than a makeover, but it is exactly the kind of judgment that prevents wasted time and repeated repairs.

The same approach works for storage. If a closet feels unusable, I would not begin by copying a picture of a redesigned closet. I would first measure the usable space separately, note where doors and outlets interfere, and list the items that need to fit. The app can help me think about the improvement, while my own measurements determine whether the idea belongs in my home.

Where first-time users may feel confused

The main possible confusion is the difference between inspiration and instruction. A polished renovation idea can communicate a direction without answering every question needed for safe execution. I read each item as one part of a larger research process and avoid assuming that a general explanation covers every variation in construction or material.

Another point of friction is knowing when a project has crossed the line from cosmetic to technical. Replacing a decorative feature and investigating a suspected water problem may look similar in a photo, but the risks are very different. If the work involves hidden wiring, gas, structural support, significant mold, or a roof system, I treat the app as background reading only. The decision to proceed should come from appropriate professional advice and local requirements.

Users may also wonder whether the free installation means every part of the experience is free. It does not. The app is free to download, but paid items are available inside it, with listed purchases ranging from $9.99 to $95.99. I would read the description of any paid option and make sure it provides something I will genuinely use. If I only want occasional ideas, the free starting point may be enough; if I plan to use it as a regular learning resource, the value depends on how often I return.

It is also worth keeping expectations realistic about personalization. A general home-improvement app cannot see the condition of your walls, understand the history of your plumbing, or know the rules that apply to your address unless you supply that context elsewhere. I use it to improve my questions, not to outsource judgment. That mindset makes the experience more reassuring and reduces the risk of treating a broad suggestion as a guaranteed solution.

How it compares with the usual alternatives

Compared with random web searches, This Old House feels more focused because the material comes through one recognizable home-improvement source. That can make browsing less chaotic than opening many unrelated pages, especially when I am still learning basic terminology. The trade-off is that a search engine is usually better when I need a very specific part number, a manufacturer’s installation instruction, or a local service provider.

Compared with video platforms, the app is more comfortable for structured exploration, while videos can be better for seeing hand positions, tool movement, and the order of physical actions. I would use the app to understand the project and narrow the approach, then consult a highly specific visual guide or product manual when I reach a step where seeing the technique matters.

Compared with a dedicated project-planning app, it is stronger as a source of ideas and general guidance than as a place to track every purchase, deadline, measurement, and task. A notes app remains faster for building a shopping list. A spreadsheet is better for comparing costs. A contractor is better for judging complex work. The useful combination is not choosing one tool for everything; it is letting this app handle the early learning stage and using specialized tools for the details.

One non-obvious advantage is that it can help prevent premature commitment. Many renovation mistakes begin with choosing a finish before understanding the underlying problem. By browsing first and writing down the decision points, I am less likely to confuse a visually appealing result with the right repair. Its limitation is the reverse: if I want a single, definitive answer for a highly specific home condition, I may need to leave the app and verify the issue elsewhere.

The next step after your first session

Once I have chosen one realistic project, I would create a small “go or pause” test. Can I describe the problem in one sentence? Do I know what a successful result should look like? Have I identified the part that could create damage if done incorrectly? Do I have a way to stop safely if the surface, wiring, plumbing, or structure is not what I expected? If any answer is unclear, more research is needed before buying supplies.

For low-risk work, begin with a reversible test whenever possible. Try a small area, inspect an inconspicuous section, or assemble the proposed arrangement without permanently attaching it. This is especially useful for finishes, storage layouts, and decorative changes. The app can provide the direction, but a small trial reveals how your actual home responds.

I would also return to the app with evidence from the room: a written measurement, a photo for personal reference, or a note about the material involved. That makes the second browsing session more productive than starting from a vague idea. The goal is to move through a cycle of observe, research, test, and decide, rather than endlessly collecting renovation inspiration.

People who enjoy home-improvement media will probably find the app easy to appreciate, particularly when they are planning their first few projects. New homeowners can use it to organize their thinking, and cautious do-it-yourselfers can use it to spot questions before they become expensive mistakes. Renters may also find useful ideas, provided they separate temporary improvements from work that requires permission or permanent changes.

My reservations are equally clear. The app will not replace local expertise, a careful inspection, a product manual, or a project tracker. The in-app purchase range means I would pay attention during checkout, and the middling average rating suggests that the experience may not satisfy every user equally. I would install it for guidance and inspiration, not because I expect an all-in-one renovation command center.

Overall, This Old House is most valuable when it helps me slow down and define the job before I touch a tool. I recommend it to anyone who wants a friendly starting point for home-improvement research and is willing to verify important details for their own property. If your next step is simply finding a sensible project and understanding what to consider first, it is worth trying. If you need exact calculations, live scheduling, or specialized technical diagnosis, another tool or a qualified professional will be the better choice.

FAQ